People who ask such questions may well do so because they are unsure. And if this uncertainty is based on Mouazan's writings, I guess it should be appropriate to conclude that she is probably not so much of a Muslim that anyone should consider it dangerous?
Or to generalize - for it is not only about Muslims and non-Muslims: if one finds it reasonable to divide the world into two groups; we can aptly call the two groups "them" and "us" - and is compelled to ask the question: "are you one of them?" - then even before asking, the conclusion should probably have been that the other party is probably not so much "one of them" that it makes any difference. And then, why ask the question at all?
Or to see it from a completely different angle: at one time it was so popular to say that "if you're not with us, you are against us". Why not turn it over and say, "if you're not against us, you are with us." Maybe even enhance it with a "welcome"?
(Translated from Ikke så meget, at det gør noget, originally published May 16, 2016)